Raiders running nowhere: Guest Writer
Written by Levi "Dizzle" Damien   
Saturday, 26 September 2009 13:11

Sure, we're only approaching week three in the NFL. It is not yet time to panic on a team that is 1-1 or one that has a quarterback completing just above 30 percent of his passes, but maybe time to be overly concerned if you are Tom Cable.

The issue at hand here is not the quarterbacks play or what he needs to do . It is the Raiders inability to run the football, something they have particularly done with ease the past two seasons in the NFL with Tom Cable in charge of the offensive line. Last season they were a top ten rushing offense.

The Raiders are currently ranked 17th in the league rushing the football, which may or may not seem bad at the moment. However, the "play-maker" of their offense hasn't exactly been beating defenders with his speed or breaking tackles. Second year tailback Darren McFadden has only had two games this season to showcase his ability. But it is disheartening to learn he only has 103 yards off of 29 attempts (3.6 yards per carry), since he is now fully recovered from turf toe. The expectations for him and the Oakland running attack are high. Expectations that have not been met.

Raiders lost arguably their best linemen in left guard Robert Gallery last Sunday in a win over the Chiefs. Erik Pears, who has never started a game at left guard in the pros, will be taking his spot over the 4-6 week time frame that Gallery is expected to be out. Pears has experience in the zone blocking scheme dating back to his time with Denver, but it still hurts the Raiders tremendously to lose Gallery.

Raiders were hoping for a better outcome with the Samson Satele trade, but came up short there. Obviously with Cable leaving starter Chris Morris at center and placing Pears at left guard shows just how little he trusts Satele. It is worth noting that Russell has been given much more time to locate his receivers than in years past due to better pass protection, but unfortunately the running game has not been able to get up to speed as well.

With the passing game a work in progress, rookies starting at receiver and Russell going through some growing pains, the Raiders have to be able to run the football. Not being able to run the football almost cost them the game to the Chiefs and hurt them badly in the second half against the Chargers.

It is either that the push up front is not there, or Oakland's starting runningback needs to elevate his game. Or maybe even give way to Michael Bush more often. Yes, McFadden is supposed to be the guy. However, is he really an every down back? If he remains healthy and is used as he has been the past two games we will find out soon enough.

Watching Michael Bush run, it may be worth reevaluating who the starting runningback is. After all, Mcfadden could be a more beneficial runner if he were used more on sweeps and toss's instead of running up the gut all the time. Just a thought.

The Denver Broncos currently rank 10th in the league in run defense, giving up low 2.9 yards a pop. Raiders will need to establish the run early, given that Champ Bailey and Brian Dawkins are likely drooling over the chance of reading two rookie receivers this Sunday. That's not to forget their pass rush, which last week had four sacks at the hands of outside linebacker Elvis Dumervil.

Raiders will have their hands full on offense. This game will likely be decided by defenses, and which quarterback makes the least mistakes. At least JaMarcus Russell has had his best games against the Broncos in the past. He has come through when it counted the most so far this season, so if he can continue to do that the Raiders should be able to pull of a win.

-- AJ DeMello, TFDS Guest Contributor



Digg! Reddit! Facebook! Technorati! StumbleUpon! BallHype: hype it up!
Comments (5)Add Comment
Bush SHOULD start
written by KnighthawK88, September 26, 2009
I was thinking all along Bush should start ahead of DMC, mainly because once he pounds the D a bit, a quicker and faster DMac could torch them. Besides, we could always split out DMC asa a decoy while Bush wears 'em down. Fargas was good at this, wearing down the D and we were ranked 10th in the league because of it. Plus, Bush is better on screens
...
written by RaiderDoc, September 26, 2009
I'm sticking with what I've said since last year... Bush should be number one hands down. I like McFadden, but Bush is bigger, stronger, is just as good as a receiver, fumbles less, is almost as fast, and is much harder to tackle. I've been very disappointed in McFadden's ability to break tackles. He doesn't seem to have much in the way of balance. One finger on him and he goes down. How many plays has he had where if he recovers from a tap on his leg he goes 20, 30, 40 yards? DMAC is looking more and more like Reggie Bush... give me Micheal Bush all day.
"It is either that the push up front is not there, or Oak's starting RB needs to elevate his game" - Really?
written by DFish, September 27, 2009
I have to say this is a pretty poor analysis. The reason the Raiders' can't run the ball is because the passing game is not a threat. The NFL is a copy-cat league - as soon as teams know that the Raiders can't consistently pass the ball - they stack the box thus limiting the running game. Even the best running game will have a hard time when a team brings up 8 in the box. With regard to the starter - the Raiders play calling is suspect - instead of using Bush as "inside" and McFadden "outside" or on screens - they continue to run straight up the middle with little success. I would like them to play in a two RB set - that way they can have a lead blocker when needed, extra protection and outlet for the passing game and not be so predictable.
Dfish is right!
written by TN Raider, September 27, 2009
Every team in the league is going to focus on stopping the Raiders run game. It's the only game they have. Anyone can look at game films and see Russell can't pass the ball. He is easliy the worst starting QB in the NFL. Most teams backup QB is better than Russell.
I would have to say I feel better when Bush is running the ball. DMAC fumbles the ball way to much. It is usually when he if fighting for extra yards. He has also had some problems catching the ball. It way be time to get Fargus back in the mix. He is a hard nose runner that holds on to the ball.
TN Raider is right about DFish being right!
written by NuclearWinter, October 01, 2009
I'd like to see them run a two RB set as well. While I agree they should use Bush up the middle more and McFadden on the outside, that shouldn't be exclusively for the sake of deception. I know Bush said he didn't wanna play FB but I thought it'd be interesting to try an I formation with Bush at FB and try some fake tosses to McFadden, or hand it to Bush, or fake it to Bush then he blocks the way for McFadden up the middle. Also maybe some PAP up the middle to the RB to take some pressure off perhaps or catch them blitzing for a nice pass. I'd just like to see more varation in general. Hell I just want to see some execution ='( should be 3-0 or 2-1

Write comment

busy
 

About Bloguin

Bloguin is the revolutionary blog network specifically focused on helping bloggers get the most out of their websites. We're currently working on building a large network of online communities and hope to expand our blogging coverage to include a wide range of topics.

Advertisers

The Bloguin Network allows advertisers to promote their products and services to our ever-growing number of visitors. We offer both site-specific ad placements as well as the ability to run a network-wide campaign. If you're interested in working with Bloguin to meet your advertising needs, please contact us.

Bloggers Wanted

The Bloguin Network is always looking to expand. We're specifically looking for blogs in the sports, entertainment, and video games field, but are open to adding any type of quality site.. If you're a blogger and interested in joining our network, please fill out our application form.

The Bloguin Login

The Bloguin Login gives you full access to everything our network has to offer. Your name and password will work for each and every one of our sites. Signing up is simple, and will allow you to post in all our forums, create member blogs, and access other cool features! What are you waiting for? Create an Account!